Alpha Convergence: Endpoint Limits for alphaIicCE #
This file proves the endpoint limit properties for alphaIicCE:
- Identification of
alphaIicandalphaIicCEa.e. - L¹ convergence to 0 at -∞ and to 1 at +∞
- A.e. pointwise convergence to 0 at -∞ and to 1 at +∞
Main results #
alphaIic_ae_eq_alphaIicCE: Raw and canonical versions are equal a.e.alphaIicCE_L1_tendsto_zero_atBot: L¹ convergence to 0 as t → -∞alphaIicCE_L1_tendsto_one_atTop: L¹ convergence to 1 as t → +∞alphaIicCE_ae_tendsto_zero_atBot: A.e. pointwise limit 0 at -∞alphaIicCE_ae_tendsto_one_atTop: A.e. pointwise limit 1 at +∞
References #
- Kallenberg (2005), Probabilistic Symmetries and Invariance Principles, Chapter 1, "Second proof of Theorem 1.1"
Identification lemma and endpoint limits for alphaIicCE #
The key results that solve the endpoint limit problem:
- Identification: The existential
alphaIicequals the canonicalalphaIicCEa.e. - L¹ endpoint limits: Using L¹ contraction of condExp, we get integral convergence
- A.e. endpoint limits: Monotonicity + boundedness + L¹ limits ⇒ a.e. pointwise limits
Identification lemma: alphaIic equals alphaIicCE almost everywhere.
Proof strategy:
Both are L¹ limits of the same Cesàro averages (1/m) ∑ᵢ (indIic t) ∘ X_{n+i}:
alphaIicis defined as the L¹ limit fromweighted_sums_converge_L1alphaIicCEis the conditional expectationμ[(indIic t) ∘ X_0 | tailSigma X]
By the reverse martingale convergence theorem (or direct L² analysis), the Cesàro averages
converge in L² (hence L¹) to the conditional expectation. Since L¹ limits are unique up
to a.e. equality, we get alphaIic =ᵐ alphaIicCE.
Note: Uses reverse martingale convergence or L² projection argument.
L¹ endpoint limit at -∞: As t → -∞, alphaIicCE → 0 in L¹.
Proof strategy:
- For t → -∞, the indicator
1_{(-∞,t]}(X_0 ω)→ 0 for each fixed ω - By dominated convergence (bounded by 1),
‖1_{(-∞,t]} ∘ X_0‖₁ → 0 - By L¹ contraction of conditional expectation:
‖alphaIicCE t - 0‖₁ = ‖μ[1_{(-∞,t]} ∘ X_0 | tailSigma] - μ[0 | tailSigma]‖₁ ≤ ‖1_{(-∞,t]} ∘ X_0 - 0‖₁ → 0
L¹ endpoint limit at +∞: As t → +∞, alphaIicCE → 1 in L¹.
Proof strategy:
Similar to the -∞ case, but 1_{(-∞,t]}(X_0 ω) → 1 as t → +∞.
A.e. pointwise endpoint limit at -∞.
Proof strategy: Combine monotonicity (from conditional expectation), boundedness (0 ≤ alphaIicCE ≤ 1), and L¹ → 0 to conclude a.e. pointwise → 0 along integers.
A.e. pointwise endpoint limit at +∞.
Proof strategy: Similar to the -∞ case, using monotonicity + boundedness + L¹ → 1.