Documentation

InfinitaryLogic.Descriptive.RealizedSpectrum

The realized-spectrum relation is Borel #

For a fragment F and an arity n, the realized spectrum of a coded structure c is the set of F-types of its n-tuples, Fragment.realizedSpectrum F n c. Two codes are F,n-spectrum equivalent (SameRealizedSpectrum) when they realize the same spectrum: every tuple of one has a matching tuple in the other, where matching means agreement on every member of the slice. Tuples and the slice are countable, so the relation is a countable combination of Borel satisfaction conditions (measurableSet_sameRealizedSpectrum). No topology on a powerset of types is needed.

Isomorphism refines the relation (sameRealizedSpectrum_of_iso): the pointed-type transport sends tuples to tuples of the same type. The converse is not claimed.

Everything here is below Silver; the dichotomy and the thinness characterization are in Conditional/FragmentSpectrumThin.lean.

Classical background: Marker, Lectures on Infinitary Model Theory (Cambridge, 2016), Corollary 3.3.3, works with the relation of realizing the same fragment types.

The arity slice of a countable fragment is countable.

The realized spectrum of a code at arity n: the F-types of its n-tuples.

Equations
Instances For

    Spectrum equivalence: the two codes realize the same F-types at arity n.

    Equations
    Instances For
      theorem FirstOrder.Language.Fragment.sameRealizedSpectrum_iff {L : Language} [L.IsRelational] (F : L.Fragment) (n : ℕ) (c d : L.StructureSpace) :
      F.SameRealizedSpectrum n c d ↔ (∀ (a : Fin n → ℕ), ∃ (b : Fin n → ℕ), F.pointedType c a = F.pointedType d b) ∧ ∀ (b : Fin n → ℕ), ∃ (a : Fin n → ℕ), F.pointedType d b = F.pointedType c a

      Spectrum equivalence, expanded: every tuple of each code has a matching tuple in the other.

      The spectrum-equivalence setoid.

      Equations
      Instances For

        Isomorphism refines spectrum equivalence.

        Borelness #

        Spectrum equivalence is Borel for a countable fragment: countable unions and intersections over tuples of the agreement conditions.