Documentation

InfinitaryLogic.Combinatorics.FiniteArityErdosRado

The finite-arity Erdős–Rado residual (bounded color cardinal, ω₁ output) #

The ER-facing statement that would discharge the Morley–Hanf pure-coloring hypothesis (pureColoringHypothesis_of_finiteArityErdosRadoOmega1 in Conditional/MorleyHanfTransfer.lean): for every well-ordered source of size ≥ ℶ_{ω₁} and every per-arity coloring family with color types of size ≤ κ, there is one ω₁-suborder homogeneous for all arities simultaneously.

FALSE-SHAPED (statement audit 2026-07-07; external literature check, not formalized here). This statement is refutable in ZFC: instantiating C n := Bool and restricting the ω₁-suborder to its first ω elements gives the partition relation ℶ_ω₁ → (ω)^{<ω}_2, which fails in ZFC — the least κ with κ → (ω)^{<ω}_2 is the Erdős cardinal κ(ω), inaccessible [Silver; Kanamori, The Higher Infinite, 2nd ed., §7, Props. 7.14(b)/7.15(b)], hence > ℶ_ω₁ (an inaccessible dominates every ℶ_α, α below it). The full argument is recorded on PureColoringHypothesis (Conditional/MorleyHanfTransfer.lean). The TRUE, proved supply is the bounded finite-arity theorem finiteArityErdosRadoBounded (Combinatorics/FiniteArityErdosRadoInduction.lean): one κ⁺-suborder homogeneous for all arities ≤ N, for every finite N — exactly the per-stage approximations the classical Morley/Hanf template route consumes. This definition is kept as a strength marker and consumer interface; morley_hanf_of_finiteArityErdosRado remains a true implication.

Two design constraints, learned the hard way, dictate the shape:

What per-arity Erdős–Rado actually gives — (ℶ_n(κ))^+ → (κ^+)^{n+1}_κ-style homogenization, with the source ℶ_{ω₁} dominating every finite stage — is the bounded theorem: the per-arity outputs can NOT be intersected/diagonalized along a single ω₁-suborder (an ω-schedule of passes needs an infinite descending sequence of ladder levels, and the audit above shows the all-arity conclusion is outright refutable). The proved chain lives in PairErdosRadoGeneral.lean (parameterized pair case: #C ≤ κ, #I ≥ (2^κ)⁺ ⇒ a κ⁺-suborder pair-homogeneous), EndHomogeneousErdosRado.lean (the end-homogenization engine), and FiniteArityErdosRadoInduction.lean (the induction and the bounded theorem).

The first ω elements of ω₁ #

noncomputable def omegaOneNatEmb :

The strictly monotone enumeration of the first ω elements of (ω₁).ToType — how an ω₁-suborder feeds the -sequence consumers (PureColoringHypothesis).

Equations
Instances For

    The residual #

    The finite-arity Erdős–Rado residual with color bound κ: for every well-ordered source I of size ≥ ℶ_{ω₁} and every family of per-arity colorings c n : (Fin n ↪o I) → C n with #(C n) ≤ κ, there is a single ω₁-suborder of I homogeneous for all arities simultaneously.

    This is the exact interface the Morley–Hanf chain consumes at κ := ℶ_1 (pureColoringHypothesis_of_finiteArityErdosRadoOmega1): the countably many Bool colorings of each arity pack into one color type {i // arity i = n} → Bool of size ≤ 2^{ℵ₀} = ℶ_1. The color bound must be a parameter — a Bool-only statement cannot absorb the packing, and iterating a one-coloring theorem over the family dies after one pass (the output ω₁-suborder is too small to source the next).

    FALSE-SHAPED for every κ ≥ 2 — refutable in ZFC via the Erdős-cardinal argument; see the module docstring above and PureColoringHypothesis. Kept as a strength marker and consumer interface; the proved supply is the bounded finiteArityErdosRadoBounded.

    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For