Conditional expectation and conditional independence along a factor map #
If T carries P to μ, then conditioning under μ on a sub-σ-algebra m is computed under
P by conditioning on the pullback algebra m.comap T:
(μ[g | m]) ∘ T =ᵐ[P] P[g ∘ T | m.comap T]
and consequently mutual conditional independence of a family under μ pulls back to mutual
conditional independence of the composed family under P, conditioned on the pullback algebra.
This is how facts proved on a factor — here, a marginal of a coupling — are consumed on the
coupling itself: every function in sight factors through the projection, and the conditioning
algebra travels by comap. Mathlib's CondIndepFun.comp composes on the codomain side only;
the domain-side transport along a measure-preserving map is what this file adds.
Proof #
The usual uniqueness argument, with the transported function as candidate: (μ[g | m]) ∘ T is
m.comap T-strongly measurable outright, and its integral over a pullback set T ⁻¹' s is
computed by the change-of-variables formula, setIntegral_condExp on the factor, and the same
formula back. No structure on the fibres of T is used.
Contents #
MeasureTheory.condExp_comp_measurePreserving;ProbabilityTheory.condExp_set_comp_measurePreserving— the single-event form, shared by both independence transports;ProbabilityTheory.condIndepFun_comp_measurePreserving— the two-function transport;ProbabilityTheory.iCondIndepFun_comp_measurePreserving— the family transport.
[StandardBorelSpace] hypotheses appear only on the conditional-independence statements, forced
by Mathlib defining conditional independence through condExpKernel; the
conditional-expectation transport itself is for arbitrary finite measures.
Conditional expectation along a factor map. If T carries P to μ, conditioning under
μ on m and transporting agrees a.e. with conditioning the transported function under P on
the pullback algebra m.comap T.
The single-event form: the conditional probability of a pulled-back event, conditioned on the pullback algebra, is the transported conditional probability of the event. No standard Borel hypothesis — this is pure conditional expectation.
Conditional independence of a pair pulls back along a factor map: two functions
conditionally independent under the factor law, given m', compose with the factor map to
functions conditionally independent under the source law, given the pullback algebra.
Mutual conditional independence pulls back along a factor map. A family that is mutually
conditionally independent under the factor law, given m', is — after composing with the factor
map — mutually conditionally independent under the source law, given the pullback algebra
m'.comap T.