Conditional Expectation Equality from Joint Laws #
This file proves the main theorem relating conditional expectations to joint laws.
Main results #
integral_condDistrib_eq_of_compProd_eq: If two kernels produce the same compProd, then integrating bounded functions against them yields the same result a.e.condExp_eq_of_joint_law_eq: Conditional expectations w.r.t. different σ-algebras coincide when the joint laws match and one σ-algebra is contained in the other.
Main theorem: Conditional expectation equality from joint law #
Conditional expectation equality from matching joint laws
If random variables ζ and η satisfy:
- Their joint laws with ξ coincide: Law(ξ, ζ) = Law(ξ, η)
- σ(η) ⊆ σ(ζ)
- η = φ ∘ ζ for some measurable φ (implied by σ(η) ⊆ σ(ζ))
Then conditional expectations w.r.t. σ(ζ) and σ(η) are equal.
This is the key result needed for the ViaMartingale proof. It follows directly from Kallenberg's Lemma 1.3 (drop-info lemma).
Proof: Direct application of condExp_indicator_eq_of_law_eq_of_comap_le
from TripleLawDropInfo.DropInfo, with variable mapping:
- X = ξ (the target random variable)
- W = η (coarser σ-algebra)
- W' = ζ (finer σ-algebra)
- h_law.symm provides (ξ, η) =^d (ξ, ζ) matching the drop-info lemma's (X, W) =^d (X, W')